Resources

This list is hardly comprehensive and your best bets for a large list are the websites run by Sky and Telescope or Astronomy magazines. I'm not so hot on the latter website simply because it confuses Netscape under Linux so badly that I not only can't view anything on their site but afterwards I have to kill Netscape because it won't display anything from any site.Because my own list of resources is growing, I've tried to organize them a bit here. Tried is the operative word.

Astronomy Books

I have lots of these resources and they are so much easy to access than all the online stuff. Living in New York City, I get two hours of "forced" reading time every day when I ride the subway back and forth to work.

If you are looking for these books, the best option might be to simply borrow them from your local library if you can, or try interlibrary loan if they don't. Here in NYC, I can get a lot of books via the library since the NYC library system is huge even though my local branch has very little. Even if you are not in a large city, ask your librarian about getting the book through interlibrary loan. It's definitely the cheapest way to get your hands on the book (and you'll be helping the libraries to continue to justify their funding).

General/Introductory

365 Starry Nights 365 Starry Nights by Chet Raymo, copyright © 1982 Prentice-Hall, published by Simon and Schuster. (The link on the book above will take you to skymaps.com, but you should be able to find this book almost anywhere.) This book has a couple of paragraphs for each day of the year and at least one illustration. It slowly works its way around the sky discussing objects which are visible on the date discussed. However, it is not completely about observational astronomy; there is information on all sorts of things. There is a good description of H-R diagrams and what they mean, historical notes related to famous astronomers, stories related to the mythology behind some of the constellations and more. This is a suitable book for young observers, too.
Nightwatch Nightwatch: A Practical Guide to Viewing the Universe by Terence Dickinson, copyright © 1998 Terence Dickinson. This is a good general introduction to astronomy as a hobby written by a good amateur. Terence Dickinson the the editor of SkyNews, a bi-monthly Canadian astronomy magazine. He starts out with general information on astronomy and covers the basics of backyard astronomy: the constellations, the night sky season-by-season, and more. There is a chapter on equipment, information on viewing tips (e.g., using averted vision), and what those catalogue numbers mean. In addition to the four general seasonal charts, there are 20 more detailed charts to get you started working through the constellations. It was in chapter 11 that I discovered that you could build a simple device (the barn-door tracker) to let you take long-exposure photos with an ordinary 35-mm camera.

Astrophotography

Astrophotography for the Amateur Astrophotography for the Amateur by Michael Covington is a wonderful book focused squarely on the amateur who wants to learn how to take good astronomical photos. There are chapters on digital processing, including CCD work, but the bulk deals with film photography.
Wide Field Astrophotography Wide Field Astrophotography by Robert Reeves is another excellent book on astrophotography which begins with information that beginners (like me) will want. In spite of the later chapters on advanced tools (e.g., Schmidt-cameras), Reeves repeatedly emphasizes what you can do with an ordinary 35-mm camera that you may already have lying around the house. Reeves' web site has some great information on films and how well suited they are for astrophotography.
Introduction to Webcam Astrophotography
Introduction to Webcam Astrophotography: Imaging the Universe with the amazing, affordable webcam is another good book by Robert Reeves. If you also have Introduction to Digital Astrophotography, you will notice some overlap in content. That is probably unavoidable since certain aspects of digital image capture are the same, and some aspects of astrophotography as the same regards of what tools you are using (things like dressing warm and packing carefully). But while some time is spent on deep-sky imaging, the main focus of this book is on the use of the webcam to take high-resolution lunar and planetary images, a use I can also recommend. Like Reeves, my first attempt to take images of the moon using a Philips ToUCam Pro 740k came out better than anything I had ever managed to do with film. In fact, I've tossed out my black-and-white film I was using for lunar photography. If you're just getting started, this is a useful book in large part because it concentrates the body of knowledge in a single place. There is little here you can't find on the web, but having it all in once place and well organized can be a big help.
Introduction to Digital Astrophotography
Introduction to Digital Astrophotography - Imaging the Universe with a Digital Camera is yet another fine book by Robert Reeves. This book focuses on the use of digital cameras, both DSLRs and point-and-shoot types and how their use changes some of the rules-of-thumb used by film photographers. Even if you were never a film astrophotographer, you'll find plenty of useful information in the book. Reading this made me antsy to get back out and do some more imaging, something that time hadn't allowed in a while.

Buying A Star?

It is difficult to say enough bad things about this practice---not about the buying part, but rather the selling part. Technically, none of the places that purport to sell you a star/star name are actually doing so. What they are selling you is the right to have your name and your star name published in a book which is registered withe U.S. Copyright Office. Uhm, most books that are published are registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Oh yes, and they will give you a nice piece of fake parchment with your star name as a receipt. If you are looking for a novelty gift, that's all well and good and I don't want to stop you. But if you think you were about to buy (or perhaps already bought) anything with some official standing, read anon....

 

Buying A Telescope

The first thing you have to know is that there is no one-size-fits-all telescope. Believe me on this one — every amateur out there would love to have a single telescope that covers everything they'd ever like to do but it simply doesn't exist. It's kind of like having the one perfect lens for your camera; there are some very good general purpose zoom lenses that will do most of what you want to do, but none will ever fit every occasion. But the good news is that there are some telescopes that will cover a wide range of types of observing.The second thing you have to know is that, like most other things, you get what you pay for. There are a few pricier brands, but the profit margin in the telescope business is nothing like it is in, say, the luxury car business where you are paying for the name. With telescopes, that name came from a history of good quality. Since there are several buyer's guides written by amateurs or sponsored by astronomy-related companies (not of which sell telescopes), I'm not going to try to cover the whole topic. Instead, here are a few sites to get you started.

Clubs and Organizations

I'm not going to try to give an exhaustive list of clubs since, as far as I know, there is no such thing. There are resources at by the Sky and Telescope, Astronomy, and SkyNews web sites with larger lists. This is merely clubs which are relatively local for me. So, if you are in the New York City area, this will be of interest, otherwise check with one of the above sites.

General Interest

These are interesting sites I like that may not fit into any particular category.

Imaging and Astrophotography

Some of these really cross multiple categories, but that is to be expected. I'm focusing on picture-taking these days, but I've got other stuff on the web site and these sites are the same way. Also, astrophotography once meant film, but now the term is used for anything that results in pretty pictures following the general trend in photography where a digital camera still produces photographs. I think the trend is more that imaging is a bit more technical or even science related, but who knows where the language will go.

Magazines

These are links to publications which, as general astronomy resources, will have links of their own. Since astronomy is their business, you may get the quickest return on your time by seeing what they have first.

Mailing Lists and News Groups

The utility of these will depend on your own interests. In my case, I've started trying to use a webcam for some pictures, and I own Starry Night Pro for both the MacOS and the Windoze, so I either subscribe or monitor these mailing lists. At this point, it is nearly impossible to keep up with the number of lists. Your best bet is to go to Yahoo groups and search for astronomy groups. The QCUAIG group below migrated to Yahoo some time ago (years ago now) and there are groups there for astronomy in general, groups related to specific equipment, groups on imaging with commodity equipment (got a digital camera?) and more.

I used to read sci.astro.amateur regularly, but at some point, the volume just got too high for me to follow. I occasionally still drop in and browse, but the advent of spam harvesters that pull email addresses from new posts has made the cost of posting just too high for me.

Software

Astronomical software comes in a lot of flavors for a lot of different uses. I've tried to break this down into sections based on how the software is used.  It is very difficult to keep up-to-date on any of this. Packages which I mention may have been orphaned and ones which didn't exist when I wrote this may have matured and become popular. So think of this more as a place to find some search terms for hunting the web.

Image Processing

As time has gone on, I've started using a wide range of image processing software. I'm still looking for the "perfect" package which probably doesn't exist. The issue is, what are you trying to do? The software I use for photos is different from what I use for digital images taken with my digital camera or videocamera.

My digital camera takes images 1280x960, my digital videocamera takes images 740x480 (with non-square pixels!). Those numbers are fixed. With 35mm film, resolution gets measured differently. The typical figure of merit for a photographic lens is a 25 µm spot size---"circle of confusion" in photography lingo. For a 50mm lens, this works out to an equivalent pixel count of about 1440x960. Based on those figures, it would seem there is no good reason to use different software. However....

Digital images typically have limited dynamic range compared to film. A typical frame from my digital camera, videocamera, or webcam is noisy and is quantized to 8-bits/color. Exposure time is limited to what the hardware will support (typically a small fraction of a second) and to get good signal-to-noise one has to "stack" multiple images.

Film, on the other hand, can be scanned at 16-bits/color and the image can be oversampled during the scanning process. My typical photo scan is around 3300x2200 pixels and produces a 40+ MB uncompressed TIFF file. Working with that is considerably different from working with a 1 MB BMP frame from my videocamera. You can use the same software for both, and in practice there is definitely some overlap. Still, you will find different tools useful for different things.

NB: This page is rather dated and I suspect you can get better info via Google.  Look at the review date before jumping to any conclusions.

AIP4WIN

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 1.4
Website: http://www.willbell.com/aip/index.htm
Cost: USD$80
License: Commercial, includes textbook
OS: Windows

This is a very nice image processing package which works on FITS images and only FITS images. However, it comes with a good importer that will load most image formats. The notable exception is 48-bit TIFF images will not be loaded. It also includes a "Universal Loader" function will will work on binary bitmap-type formats like those of the NetPBM package, which is how I get my 48-bit images loaded. What makes this an especially good value is that it comes with a textbook-like tutorial on everything you ever wanted to know about astronomical image processing, The Handbook of Astronomical Image Processing.

AstroStack

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 0.9
Website: http://www.astrostack.com/
Cost: FreeWare
License: None
OS: Windows

AstroStack is a "simple" program that takes multiple Windows Bitmap (.bmp) files, aligns and averages them. It has the ability to run some filters over the finished results and inclues dark and flat frame normalization as well. The chief limitation is the averaging part; your image is limited to 8-bits per color plane which is fine for planetary images but insufficient for deep-sky. "AstroStack II" has been released and I have not yet used it. It has increased the image size restrictions, but as of this writing, is still limited to black-and-white and is not yet feature-complete when compared to AstroStack 0.9.

AVI2BMP

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 0.49, 0.50
Website: http://avi2bmp.free.fr/
Cost: FreeWare
License: None
OS: Windows

AVI2BMP does a little bit more than its name would suggest. In addition to converting AVI files into Window bitmap files, it can convert both AVI and BMP files into the more standard FITS files used by most astronomical imaging software. And, while doing this, it can take an automatically crop planetary images to a rectangular area around the planetary disk. This is immensely useful for shrinking a huge, mostly blank image into something that requires a lot less disk space and it will make later processing steps (e.g., by Iris) run much faster as they are manipulating smaller images.

Version 0.50 is only available in French, version 0.49 is availabe in both French and English. If you don't speak French, that won't keep you from using version 0.50, especially after you become familiar with version 0.49, and if you stick with version 0.49 you aren't missing much.

GIMP

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 1.2
Website: http://www.gimp.org/
Cost: Free
License: GPL
OS: Linux, Unix, Windows

The GIMP is the Open Source Movement's answer to PhotoShop. With the GIMP, you can to pretty much anything you can do with PhotoShop. Although I'm certain that graphics arts professionals may have a different view due to their level of experience, the casual user will be quite happy with how much you can do. My use of the GIMP is largely limited to creating image rollovers to provide labels for my photos. Like PhotoShop, this is best accomplished via layers which allow you to leave your base image untouched and makes it east to group your changes in an easy-to-throw-away fashion. Yes, that sounds goofy, but I have taken and thrown out an entire layer to start over with it.

The GIMP also has the tools you would expect with a graphic arts program, filters to sharpen (or blur) your images, brightness and color curve and histogram adjustments, color correction, image type conversion, etc. I consider the GIMP and PhotoShop useful for final composition but they are probably not what you want to start with. The biggest limitation with the GIMP is that it does not do 16-bits/color. It will import a 48-bit TIFF, but internally it has already converted it 24-bit TIFF. This is to be rectified in version 2, and there is a version called Film GIMP which already has 16-bit/color support, albeit I understand it only works with CMYK images at present. PhotoShop is marginally better, but even there you will have to convert your image to 8-bits/color before you can create any layers. I have on good authority that this is true even in PhotoShop 7.

In short, you probably want something like the GIMP for final image composition, especially if you want to create overlays, but it is not a strict requirement.

ImagesPLUS

Reviewed: 2006-09-01
Version: 2.80
Website: http://www.mlunsold.com/
Cost: USD$170
License: Commericial
OS: Windows

I've had an opportunity to use ImagesPlus in an somewhat limited fashion.  My primary motivation for using it was to control my Canon Digital Rebel XT (350D) cameras.  Yes, plural.  Alas, that proved to be only partially possible.  It should be completely possible and Mike Unsold has it working with multiple dissimilar camera, but I have two 350Ds with identical firmware and while it sees both camera and even fires their shutters independently but when the software attempts to download the images, it hangs.  Not catastrophically (i.e., I don't have to reboot Windows), but enough that it's not fully functional for my needs.

However, ImagesPlus does a lot more than just control digital cameras.  It can also do file format conversions and serves as a fairly nice image processing tool in it's own right.  Again, I've used it almost exclusively in the DSLR control mode and for converting raw images to 48-bit linear TIFF.  Despite the problem with controlling my dual Canon 350Ds, the package is worth a good look and Mike Unsold makes his living from this so he's quite responsive to issues in the package.  Oh, and while the software itself fits on a single CD,  that CD has several video tutorials of how to use the software and the total package includes another four (yes, a total of five) CDs with more video tutorials.

Iris

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 3.72
Website: http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/us/iris/iris.htm
Cost: FreeWare
License: None
OS: Windows

Iris is a fairly complete piece of software which is not hard to use but not exatly intuitive either. Some features are easier to use from the Iris console window, others from the menu. It has the feel of something pieced together over time by people who were doing it for themselves rather than as a project for other people. But the more professional AIP4WIN doesn't have some of the features included in Iris, e.g., maximum entropy deconvolution and Iris is easier to use for batches of AVI frames. My chief complaint is that all of the commands for reducing multiple images into a single registered and normalized image take both a filename prefix and a count but won't let you select a starting point in the file sequence. That is, you can process files jup1.fit through jup100.fit but not jup51.fit through jup100.fit. You'll also probably want to take a look at AVI2BMP for preprocessing.

Christian Buil does a great job of adding features to Iris and you will want to check back at his web site every couple of months to see if he's added something you want. He's also responsive to email. Iris is the only package I have which will do Maximum Entropy Deconvolution. However, like many other features, this one is not available from the menus. That is probably the only real weakness of Iris; many functions are not on the menus and you must use the command-line tool to get at them. This is not a big deal to me, but it does mean that if you are accustomed to learning by poking at the menus you won't begin to exploit all of the features. The HTML documentation is available via the Iris Home Page and is kept up-to-date.

PictureWindow

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 3.1 Pro
Website: http://www.dl-c.com/
Cost: USD$50, USD$90 (Pro)
License: Commercial
OS: Windows

Picture Window Pro has been a wonderful find for me. I saw it recommended by several members of the APML group. I've found that for most of my image processing, this is the tool of choice. First, it does all of its operations in 16-bit mode. There are only a handful of functions you can do in 16-bit mode with PhotoShop and none (yet, anyway) in the GIMP. It's mode of operation is a bit different that PhotoShop or the GIMP, in particular, there are no layers. When PWP operates on an image, it creates a copy of the modified image. The "Tools" menu is an exception, e.g., the clone tool to remove blemishes, then the current image is modified in place.

There are certainly a handful of things which PWP doesn't do: there are no "advanced" filters specific to astronomy, e.g., Richardson-Lucy deconvolution. But it does have a very good alignment/registration tool. While RegiStar is better for deep-sky images probably in quality and definitely in ease-of-use, PWP has been invaluable for registering my lunar images. I highly recommend this program.

RegiStar

Reviewed: 2002-10-04
Version: 1.0
Website: http://www.aurigaimaging.com/
Cost: USD$149
License: Commercial, multiple licenses free
OS: Windows

RegiStar is the easiest to use image registration program I have ever used. Iris has more-or-less automatic registration for planetary images that works with only a little setup, but it only operates on FITS. RegiStar works on whatever you load in but it only works on non-planetary images which, as the name implies, have stars in them. Its registration process is about one step short of magic. Load your images, tell it to find the stars, then pick a pair and ask it to register the images. Repeat this using the same base image for each of your images and finally ask it to combine the set. You have a choice of several different ways of merging the images (mean, median, add, ...) and of cropping (union, intersection, crop to base image).

RegiStar will work with up to 16-bits/color so if your images are already 16-bits/color you will not be able to add them, you will have to average them. This is perhaps the only weakness, and its pretty minor. Yes, it would be nice to be able to take half-a-dozen 48-bit TIFF deep-sky images, add them, convert to FITS and write out for another round of processing. But

Linux-based Software

Okay, this really overlaps the stuff above, and it's more-or-less a place-holder now for things I don't want to forget.

  • Lin4Astro is a CD-based tool-suite for doing astronomy with a webcam under Linux. The above link will take you to the English-language version of the web site, but the native language is French. I haven't used the above yet, but I hope to get my laptop set up to run Linux and give it a spin.
  • David Whysong's Linux tools; David Whysong is (was?) an astrophysics graduate student and he has put together a few Linux-based tools for analyzing images under Linux.

Planetarium Programs

I used Starry Night Deluxe (no longer made) and now use Starry Night Pro and XEphem, but there are a large number of different planetarium-like programs. I say planetarium-like because some of them are oriented more toward specific observing tasks.

  • Starry Night — A family of programs which currently comes in three flavors: Backyard, Beginner, and Pro. They used to make a Deluxe edition somewhere in between the Beginner and the Pro. Starry Night is well regarded, particularly for it's imagery but it is hard for me to compare it with other software, e.g., The Sky because the latter would more properly be compared against Starry Night Pro.
  • XEphem — a Unix/Motif program which does a great job at a number of observation-related tasks including producing sky charts. It can't be compared to Starry Night, or most of the other Windoze products simply because it never tries to product photo-realistic imagery. I love it because I can plug in the entire USNO A2.0 catalogue (6.5 Gbytes!) without having to reformat it (something I would have to do for Starry Night).

Weather Information

Most forecast sites focus on the sort of weather the typical person is interested in; i.e., should I take an umbrella today or pile on the sunscreen? When the weather announces says "clear skies" tonight, do you really have any clue what he means? The meteorologist definition of "clear skies" seem to be rather different from mine....

Astronomy Forecast

NYC Clear Sky Clock

In November 2001, Doug Tanaka posted a message on sci.astro.amateur about the Clear Sky Clock. The underlying forecast is done by Canadian Meteorological Center (or jump straight to the astronomy forecast). The result is two measures of interest to every astronomer: what kind of cloud cover will I have and how transparent will the sky be.

If you find this image, or the underlying forecast maps, useful please drop Allan Rahill an email. He needs to show his bosses at CMC that his astronomy forecasts are actually being used.

Other Locations

 

Clock Preview Comments/Links
New York City The greatest city in the world and where I happen to live.
Robert Moses State Park A park on Long Island used by the Amateur Observer's Society and the Astronomical Society of Long Island.
Narrowsburg, NY Narrowsburg, NY Clear Sky Thumbnail Chart Friend's home on the NY/PA border.
Wawayanda State Park Wawayanda State Park Clear Sky Thumbnail Chart A park near Highland Lakes. Used by the Rockland Astronomy Club.
Lake Taghkanic State Park A park used by the Rockland Astronomy Club. Near Jackson Corners.
Hauppauge  
West Point In Orange County
Wilcox Park In Milan. A site of the Mid-Hudson Astronomy Association (MHAA).

US Government Weather Resources

The Usual Places

This is a short list of some major weather information sites. You probably already know some of these. If you want up-to-date weather links, you're probably better off to check with Google or Yahoo.